A Tunnel would cost $9 per rider it generates for Eastside light rail

Posted by

Looking at the financials for light rail in Bellevue, the Tunnel option just doesn’t make fiscal sense. Here are the numbers…

A tunnel would cost 77% more than the Vision Line ($430 MM more).

While many claim the Vision Line would reduce ridership, the Transit study determined that ridership would only be 5% lower.

So here’s the killer question: How cost efficient is the tunnel? Well, simply, not very. After 50 years of ridership (assuming light rail were ready to go today and at steady-state ridership), the Tunnel option would cost $9 PER RIDER it generates over the Vision Line. With expected fares to cost ~$3 or so, this just doesn’t make sense. The Vision Line is much more sensible, costing $1.06 per rider in infrastructure costs.

The answer is a no-brainer. Generating 95% of the ridership at about half the cost is an easy winner. Paying over $9.00 per rider doesn’t make any sense.

You can read the full report here. You can read previous praise of Kevin Wallace’s plan here.

Note: Infrastructure Cost Per Rider assumes steady-state volume over 50 years. “Vision Line” allocates total riders to Total Vision Line Cost. “Additional Ridership Generated From Tunnel Line” allocates the higher cost of the tunnel ($430 MM) to the additional ridership generated (5% higher ridership over 50 years).

Be Sociable, Share!